Abstract


 
 
 
 Al-qard wal ijarah is a financing product available at Islamic Banks with the aim of making it easier for people to perform the pilgrimage. Hajj bailout funds are basically in order to make it easier for people to perform the pilgrimage. Whereas Law Number 21 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking, Article 1 paragraph (1) in this Law states that; Sharia Banking is everything that concerns Sharia Banks and Sharia Business Units, including institutions, business activities and procedures and processes in carrying out their business activities. In practice, there are problems when there is a default in the agreement. This research is to examine the arrangements for the implementation of the Qard Wal Ijarah Akad Agreement on Hajj Bailout Funds at Islamic Banks and examine the provisions of the Qard Wal Ijarah Akad Agreement on Hajj Bailout Funds at Islamic Banks in order to achieve legal certainty. This study uses an analytical knife, namely using the theory of legal certainty and the theory of agreements.
 The method used in this study is normative juridical research, namely library law research or secondary data with sources of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The research approach used is the statute approach, conceptual approach, analytical approach, case approach and legal material collection techniques by identifying and inventorying positive legal materials, literature books, journals and other sources of legal materials. For legal material analysis techniques, legal interpretation (interpretation) is systematic interpretation and legal construction methods by analogy, legal refinement construction (rechtsverfijning) and argumentum a contrario. The results of the researcher's analysis conclude that the arrangement in implementing the consequences of the agreement in the Qard Wal Ijarah contract for the financing of hajj bailout funds at Islamic banks raises problems when there is a default in the agreement. Defaults committed by parties causing losses to Islamic Banks. The absence of collateral in the ijarah contract agreement raises concerns about fraud in the Hajj bailout fund financing at Islamic banks. The provisions of the Qard Wal Ijarah Contract Agreement for Hajj Bailout Funds at Islamic Banks in order to achieve legal certainty is that there is a guarantee in financing that has several functions, namely increasing the level of trust of the owner of the funds to the user of the funds. In addition, the guarantee function can be a means of paying debts in the event of default by cashing in or selling the collateral. In this case, collateral in Islamic bank financing is a support or reinforcement for banks to provide financing for third parties. The researcher's suggestion is that for the government it is necessary to make specific regulations in terms of making an Ijarah agreement deed by including a guarantee clause as a deterrent and a solution in the event of a default. For financing distributors, putting more emphasis on implementing the customer's character, capacity (customer's ability in future business prospects), collateral (collateral) so as not to harm.
 
 
 

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call