Abstract

Notary Authority is very important for the parties who make an agreement under the civil law. In performing their duties, notaries are required to maintain their accuracy and prudence, in order to provide justice, without any discrimination, thus providing legal certainty and the protection of human rights of the parties concerned. Under the provisions of Article 63 of the Law on Notary, there has been obscurity and vacuum of norms. The said obscurity of norm is about the certainty of protocols’ submission of notaries which have been overdue as specified on the provisions of Article 63 of Law on Notary Position. The vacuum of norms also mean the lack of certainty about who is responsible for the notary protocols, the absence of the regulations related to who should receive the protocols and the lack of sanctions against the notary who has been designated to receive the protocol by the Regional Supervisor Assembly but was not willing to accept the protocol. These provisions give rise to legal issues namely: what the legal consequences of Notary Protocols that have not been submitted after the deadline for submission and how the provisions of sanctions against the notary who is not willing to accept the protocols.
 The type of research used in this thesis was a normative legal research because of the obscurity and the vacuum of norms. The legal materials collection techniques used were a literature study and a card system. To analyze the legal materials, it was used descriptive techniques, interpretation, construction and argumentation theories and concepts associated with the relevant legal issues.
 The results showed that the Notary Protocol Submission to the recipient of the protocols which have passed the submission deadline resulted in some juridical consequences. The consequences include: Incidence of doubt, the uncertainty associated with the filing of the protocol the Notary. The lack of certainty associated with the accountability to the possibility of loss and destruction of the protocols of Notary. Other consequences that arise are if the parties concerned are unable to obtain a copy of their certificates back in the event of the onset of a dispute between the parties. If the notaries proved to have violated, they can be subject to sanctions. The sanctions that may be imposed on the Notaries if they make any violations are the administrative sanctions, civil penalties and criminal sanctions.

Highlights

  • The said obscurity of norm is about the certainty of Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Magister Kenotariatan, 2016-2017 protocols’ submission of notaries which have been overdue as specified on the provisions of Article 63 of Law on Notary Position

  • The vacuum of norms mean the lack of certainty about who is responsible for the notary protocols, the absence of the regulations related to who should receive the protocols and the lack of sanctions against the notary who has been designated to receive the protocol by the Regional Supervisor Assembly but was not willing to accept the protocol

  • These provisions give rise to legal issues namely: what the legal consequences of Notary Protocols that have not been submitted after the deadline for submission and how the provisions of sanctions against the notary who is not willing to accept the protocols

Read more

Summary

Buku-Buku : DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Bambang Setijoprodjo, 1996, Persiapan Pelaksanaan Hak Tanggungan di Lingkungan Perbankan, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung. H.Salim, HS dan Erlies Septiana Nurbani, 2013, Penerapan Teori Hukum pada. Jendral dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Jakarta. C.S.T dan Christine S.T Kansil, 1997, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2008, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Kencana Pranada Media Group, Jakarta. Suharnoko,2004, Hukum Perjanjian ; Teori dan Analisa Kasus, Kencana, Jakarta. 1993, Hukum dan Ketentuan Perbankan di Indonesia, Grafiti, Jakarta. 3. Peraturan Perundang-undangan : Undang-Undang nomor 4 Tahun 1996, tentang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Beserta. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia nomor 7 tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan, (Lembaran Negara Tahun 1992, nomor 31). Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar-Dasar Pokok Agraria (Lembaran Negara Tahun 1960 Nomor 104, Tambahan Lembar Negara Nomor 2043). SH., M.Hum.** Pembimbing II : I Nyoman Sumardika, SH.,M.Kn***

Tujuan Umum
Tujuan Khusus
Manfaat Penelitian
Manfaat Praktis
Teori Pertanggungjawaban
Teori Kepastian Hukum
Bahan Hukum Primer
Teknik Pengumpulan Bahan
Teknik Analisis Bahan Hukum
Teori dan Konsep tentang Tanggung jawab
Konsep tentang Kewenangan
Hakekat Jabatan Notaris
Tanggung jawab hukum Notaris terhadap
Proses Penyerahan Protokol
Konsekuensi yuridis dari protokol
PENGATURAN
Sanksi terhadap Pelanggaran yang dilakukan Notaris
Simpulan
BUKU – BUKU
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call