7-days of FREE Audio papers, translation & more with Prime
7-days of FREE Prime access
7-days of FREE Audio papers, translation & more with Prime
7-days of FREE Prime access
https://doi.org/10.1300/j064v15n04_04
Copy DOIJournal: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture | Publication Date: Jun 15, 2000 |
Citations: 55 |
ABSTRACT The practice of leaving clippings on the lawn recycles nutrients and reduces yard-waste but the residue of unsightly clippings deters widespread adoption. An experiment was conducted on a Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) turf to evaluate mowing practice in combination with various fertilizer types and application rates. The main objective was to minimize clipping yield while achieving acceptable turfgrass quality. The return of clippings, as compared to clipping removal, was associated with fewer weeds and a darker green more luxuriant turf. Furthermore, the benefits of clipping return were achieved using half (97.6 kg ha□ 1 yr□ 1) as much N as is typically applied (195.2 kg ha□ 1 yr□ 1) for high maintenance turf. Slow-release N fertilizers were shown to reduce spring clipping yield and thereby make the practice of clipping return a more acceptable mowing practice.
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.