Abstract
In this article, I ask how a respondent-centered understanding of reference groups might offer new insights into the study of subjective well-being. Analyzing unique microlevel data from rural Ghana, I examine the influence of reference groups’ economic characteristics on respondents’ perceptions of their economic well-being. I find that the way a reference group is defined is strongly associated with whether respondents experience relative deprivation or positive effects. As in other studies, an increase in the economic status of spatially defined reference groups is associated with relative deprivation. In contrast, findings from reference groups defined with social network data on gift receipt or trust are more complex. Respondents are likelier to report higher levels of subjective well-being when their social networks’ assets increase and expenditures decrease. That is, respondents feel better when the people they trust or the people they have received gifts from are wealthy but thrifty. This likely indicates that respondents hope to draw on members from these “potential helper” networks in times of need.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.