Abstract

Everyday social interactions require us to closely monitor, predict, and synchronise our movements with those of an interacting partner. Experimental studies of social synchrony typically examine the social-cognitive outcomes associated with synchrony, such as affiliation. On the other hand, research on the sensorimotor aspects of synchronisation generally uses non-social stimuli (e.g. a moving dot). To date, the differences in sensorimotor aspects of synchronisation to social compared to non-social stimuli remain largely unknown. The present study aims to address this gap using a verbal response paradigm where participants were asked to synchronise a ‘ba’ response in time with social and non-social stimuli, which were presented auditorily, visually, or audio-visually combined. For social stimuli a video/audio recording of an actor performing the same verbal ‘ba’ response was presented, whereas for non-social stimuli a moving dot, an auditory metronome or both combined were presented. The impact of autistic traits on participants’ synchronisation performance was examined using the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). Our results revealed more accurate synchronisation for social compared to non-social stimuli, suggesting that greater familiarity with and motivation in attending to social stimuli may enhance our ability to better predict and synchronise with them. Individuals with fewer autistic traits demonstrated greater social learning, as indexed through an improvement in synchronisation performance to social vs non-social stimuli across the experiment.

Highlights

  • Everyday social interactions require us to closely monitor, predict, and synchronise our movements with those of an interacting partner

  • This finding is not unexpected, as audition has been found to be superior in temporal processing, whereas the visual modality is superior in spatial ­processing[20]

  • Individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) typically face challenges in social communication and sensory ­processing[30], and often experience difficulties in integrating multisensory i­nformation[31]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Everyday social interactions require us to closely monitor, predict, and synchronise our movements with those of an interacting partner. For both social and non-social stimuli, synchronisation with audio-visual combined conditions is expected to result in lower asynchrony compared to the audio and visual only c­ onditions[25]. Synchronisation performance was better for auditory and audio-visual conditions in Scientific Reports | (2021) 11:8805 |

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call