Abstract

We consider biased $(1:b)$ Avoider-Enforcer games in the monotone and strict versions. In particular, we show that Avoider can keep his graph being a forest for every but maybe the last round of the game if $b \geq 200 n \ln n$. By this we obtain essentially optimal upper bounds on the threshold biases for the non-planarity game, the non-$k$-colorability game, and the $K_t$-minor game thus addressing a question and improving the results of Hefetz, Krivelevich, Stojaković, and Szabó. Moreover, we give a slight improvement for the lower bound in the non-planarity game.

Highlights

  • Avoider-Enforcer games can be seen as the misere version of the well-known MakerBreaker games

  • We may assume that Avoider is always the first player since the choice of the player who is making the first move does not have an impact on our results

  • It was proved by Hefetz, Krivelevich, Stojakovic, and Szabo [7] that for every the electronic journal of combinatorics 22(1) (2015), #P1.60 k 3, Avoider can win the strict (1 : b) “non-k-colorability” game N Cnk against any bias larger than

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Avoider-Enforcer games can be seen as the misere version of the well-known MakerBreaker games (studied first by Lehman [10], Chvatal and Erdos [6] and Beck [1, 3]). Define N Cnk to be the set consisting of the edge sets of all non-k-colorable graphs on n vertices It was proved by Hefetz, Krivelevich, Stojakovic, and Szabo [7] that for every the electronic journal of combinatorics 22(1) (2015), #P1.60 k 3, Avoider can win the strict (1 : b) “non-k-colorability” game N Cnk against any bias larger than. For n sufficiently large and b 200n ln n, Avoider can ensure that in the monotone/strict (1 : b) Avoider-Enforcer game by the end of the game his graph is planar, k-colorable for k 3, and does not contain a Kt-minor for t 4. Krivelevich, Stojakovic, and Szabo conjectured in [7] that the Avoider-Enforcer non-planarity, non-k-colorability and the Kt-minor games should be asymptotically monotone as n tends to infinity That is their upper and lower threshold should be of the same order, i.e. fF−n = Θ(fF+n).

Forests and almost forests
Lower bound in the non-planarity game
Findings
Open questions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call