Abstract

Predators shape prey populations by elimination of individuals (consumptive effects) and by inducing modifications in prey behaviour, physiology or morphology (NCE—non-consumptive effects). Due to the resource allocation to defence, decreased feeding and higher stress, the costs of predator NCEs can be considerable. Therefore, the resistance to NCEs may be crucial for population growth and interspecific competition. We tested the resistance of Ponto-Caspian gammarids Dikerogammarus villosus and Pontogammarus robustoides to NCEs imposed by their predator, the racer goby Babka gymnotrachelus. As D. villosus is often avoided by predators in the presence of alternative food, we hypothesised that it would bear lower behavioural and physiological costs of anti-predator responses. We tested gammarid feeding in short-time experiments (2–4 h) with food (chironomid larvae) located at various distances from the stony shelter (to enforce food searching, Experiment I) or in the direct gammarid proximity (no searching needed, Experiment II). Moreover, we checked the predator effect on gammarid growth in a 2-week Experiment III. Both gammarids exposed to predators reduced feeding efficiency outside the shelter (Experiment I). Contrary to our expectations, the response of D. villosus was stronger. When food was provided in their direct proximity (Experiment II), the feeding of both species was unaffected by predators, indicating that a shelter supplied with food can reduce predator NCEs. The growth of P. robustoides was reduced in the presence of predators (Experiment III), whereas that of D. villosus was unaffected. Although D. villosus has a more effective defence strategy than P. robustoides, it bears similar or even higher behavioural costs of NCEs. However, it exhibits the higher resistance to the long-term predator presence, sustaining its growth rate under such conditions. This may be one of the factors contributing to the great invasion success of D. villosus, currently taking place in European fresh waters.

Highlights

  • Sustained interaction between predator and prey species is a fundamental force driving changes in community structure and dynamics in every ecosystem

  • D. villosus exhibited a stronger response to the predator presence than P. robustoides

  • We predicted that the behavioural response exhibited by D. villosus would be weaker, since it has a harder exoskeleton [37] and a higher survival rate in the presence of predators [38]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sustained interaction between predator and prey species is a fundamental force driving changes in community structure and dynamics in every ecosystem. Predators shape prey populations doubly, by consumption of the most vulnerable individuals (consumptive effects— CEs) and indirectly by inducing costly defensive changes in development, morphology, physiology and behaviour (non-consumptive effects, called trait-mediated effects or non-lethal effects—NCEs) [1]. During recent years some studies showed the costs of non-consumptive effects to be equal or even exceed those of the direct predation, significantly affecting the functioning of the community [1,2,3,4]. In contrast to direct predation, when relatively few individuals are killed by the predator, the cost of non-consumptive effects affects all members of the community [10], especially in an aquatic environment [2]. Resistance to negative aspects of non-consumptive effects may positively affect survival, population growth and the outcome of interspecific competition [11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call