Abstract

Sir, The report by Panigrahi etal. made for interesting reading.[1] We would like to make certain observations regarding such a complication. The polyvinyl chloride tracheal tube(TT) possesses a preformed contour. When we keep the tube in such a position that the inherent curve of the tube faces anteriorly, the attachment of the pilot balloon also faces anteriorly. In this position, beveled distal end of the tube faces to the left and the Murphy's eye to the right. When a right-handed anesthesiologist intubates the trachea with this tube, he performs laryngoscopy along the right border of the tongue and fixes the TT at the right corner of the mouth. In general, the TT curve is tilted toward right and the Murphy's eye faces posteriorly in this situation. Before performing percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy, the TT is withdrawn so that it does not come in the way of the introducer needle. If the TT is withdrawn in the same position as described above, it is extremely unlikely that the guidewire will enter the Murphy's eye without piercing the TT first. If the tube is rotated by 90° to the left by bringing its inherent curve anteriorly, there is again very little space for the guidewire to enter the Murphy's eye. Only if the TT is further rotated 90° to the left, the Murphy's eye is exposed to guidewire entry. This position of the TT is not the usual position in which the withdrawn tube is kept by most of the clinicians. Moreover, if the TT has been initially placed and subsequently withdrawn in such a position that its curve and pilot balloon attachment faced to the left, the Murphy's eye becomes directly exposed to guidewire entry leading to the problems described. Hence, we should be careful during the withdrawal of TT that it should not lie in a position that exposes the Murphy's eye to the path of the introducer needle. Another way in which the guidewire can enter the Murphy's eye is retrogradely. If the J-tip of the guidewire faces cephalad during insertion, it may move cephalad and enter the Murphy's eye. On looking closely at the two figures, we can conclude that in the second case, the guidewire had directly entered the Murphy's eye and not retrogradely. We are also concerned that during withdrawal of the TT, the guidewire was allowed to come out along with the tube. Loss of a correctly placed guidewire can be catastrophic in certain situations and attempts should be made to retain it in position. Finally, the introducer needle has no scope to “pierce” the Murphy's eye. All it can do is to “pass” through it! Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call