Abstract
It is difficult, somehow, to imagine Keats being interested in such an ostensibly ‘un-Keatsian’ pursuit as historical linguistics. Indeed, if the critical literature is to be believed, Keats had very little contact with language scholarship. There is only a single reference to the poet in Aarsleff’s The Study of Language in England, 1780–1860, which cites Keats among the authors whom Tennyson and his philologist friends (the ‘Apostles’) were reading at Trinity College in the late 1820s and early 1830s. The Cambridge Companion to Keats contains an essay by Garrett Stewart with the promising title of ‘Keats and Language’, but this turns out to be an exercise in new critical close reading, focusing on sonority and ‘verbal slippage’ in Lamia, rather than on Keats’s familiarity with the linguistic debates of the day.1 William Keach’s otherwise outstanding essay on ’Romanticism and Language’ in The Cambridge Companion to British Romanticism fails to mention Keats even once.2 When we think of philologically sophisticated poets, it would appear that Keats does not readily spring to mind.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.