Abstract

The Sale and Purchase of the mortgage lending object is intended to pay off the loan from the debtor. Based on the background, then as for the formulation of the problem of writing is a. How does the validity of the sale and purchase of the object of guarantee of mortgage rights by the bank conducted without through the auction mechanism? b. What are the legal consequences for the sale and purchase of the mortgage guarantee object by the bank which is conducted without the auction mechanism? The research method used is normative juridical research with approach approaches statute approach, conceptual approach, case approach (Case Approach). The result of this research is the Sale and Purchase of the object of mortgage guarantee which is done under the hand and without the debtor's consent is a unlawful act where the sale and purchase of the mortgage security object is contrary to the provisions set forth in Article 6 and Article 20 of Law no. 4 Year 1996 Concerning the Rights of Consumers therefore the sale and purchase of a guarantee maternity guarantee is null and void or it is deemed that there has never been any sale. Furthermore, the Sale and Purchase of the underwriting object under the hand is contrary to Article 20 paragraph 1 (one), paragraph 2 (two), and paragraph 3 (three) of Law no. 4 of 1996 Concerning the Deposit Rights shall have legal consequences for the Creditor as the seller and PPAT as the Officer making the Sale and Purchase Certificate as well as for the Buyer who has good trade

Highlights

  • Abstrak: Penjualan dan Pembelian objek pinjaman hipotek dimaksudkan untuk melunasi pinjaman dari debitur

  • The Sale and Purchase of the mortgage lending object is intended to pay off the loan from the debtor

  • What are the legal consequences for the sale and purchase of the mortgage guarantee object by the bank which is conducted without the auction mechanism? The research method used is normative juridical research with approach approaches statute approach, conceptual approach, case approach (Case Approach)

Read more

Summary

Tanggungan dan selanjutnya dilakukan pendaftaran pembebanan

Sedangkan dalam hal mengatasi masalah nasabah bank atau yang disebut dengan debitur yang melakukan wanprestasi atau cidera janji, bank sering kali mengalami kesulitan untuk memperoleh pelunasan kreditnya. Jika ditempuh dengan cara gugatan melalui pengadilan, maka memerlukan waktu yang lama dan biaya yang cukup banyak, meskipun dalam proses beracara di pengadilan menganut asas sederhana, cepat dan biaya ringan. Secara fakta sejarah perbankan di Indonesia telah mewariskan senjata yang paling ampuh dan cepat dalam memberantas kredit macet yaitu melalui Parate eksekusi atau mengeksekusi sendiri/langsung (melelang) agunan tanpa campur tangan pengadilan

Menurut Sri Soedewi Mascjhoen
Barang Milik Badan Usaha
Jual beli atas objek jaminan hak tanggungan yang bertentangan dengan
Adapun pemberian ganti kerugian menurut KUHPerdata sebagai berikut
Daftar Bacaan
Yang Dihadapi Oleh
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call