Abstract

The article points out the fact that histories of are often based on a kind of circular logic because they seek to find predecessors to a contemporary conception of However, this approach compels us to ignore a wide range of theories which operated with the notion of in the past. In conclusion what we look for in history is only a confirmation of our present beliefs. This approach prevents us from seeing that were used for various purposes and that their meaning may not be inferred from a static definition, as proposed in the Vienna Declaration of 1993, but from the argumentative purpose for which they are used in communication. If we continue to believe that are Platonic ideas which are absolutely good, and the use of which may not be a subject of systematic scrutiny, we easily become victims of anyone who uses as an argument.In order to question contemporary beliefs in the self-sufficient power of the notion of rights, I focus on the moment when a fully-fledged theory of appeared for the first time in history. My intention is to show from the example of the first legal theories of that the meaning of this term changes according to the context and that it is not guaranteed by an exact definition, or by using the exact wording human rights. In order to show this, our article follows the emergence of the idea of in early legal and philosophical theories. We start with the emergence of the exact wording human rights in Spanish theology of the 16th century and gradually add the notion of inalienable goods in Grotius, and proceed to the application of rights in natural law and social contract theories of the 17th century. The case of Spinoza's use of and democracy even shows that the meaning of such key terms can be changed quite dramatically. Even though none of the early modern lawyers we have discussed proposed that justice should be guaranteed by a bill of rights, I point out that early modern lawyers sought to guarantee justice by providing a well-thought-out system of laws that would be based on simple and absolutely true principles of justice.

Highlights

  • Kdo vymyslel lidská práva? Tato otázka vedla již v minulosti k mnoha vášnivým sporům mezi národy i konfesijními skupinami a zdá se, že i dnes dokáže přitáhnout zájem širší veřejnosti

  • Pokud by zvídavý občan pátral po konkrétním výčtu, vídeňská deklarace jej odkazuje na Všeobecnou deklaraci lidských práv z roku 1948, v níž jsou každému člověku garantovány život, svoboda, bezpečnost, svoboda svědomí a projevu a osobní majetek

  • Že musí být uplatněn ekvivalent pojmu „právo“, tedy oprávnění k aktivnímu prosazení svých nároků, a že tento výraz musí být uplatněn v plurálu

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Kdo vymyslel lidská práva? Tato otázka vedla již v minulosti k mnoha vášnivým sporům mezi národy i konfesijními skupinami a zdá se, že i dnes dokáže přitáhnout zájem širší veřejnosti.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call