Abstract
Aśoka’s Mauryan Empire is a remarkable exemplar of Kautilyan ‘Political Realism between realpolitik and moralpolitik’. Noticeably, Aśoka’s Mauryan Empire—as a fusion of realpolitik and moralpolitik—offers a non-Western alternative to the ‘rationalist-reflectivist debate’ on legitimate exercise of power in Eurocentric IR. The rationalist-reflectivist debate on legitimate exercise of power in Eurocentric IR revolves around the diverged doctrines of realpolitik and moralpolitik: as such, ‘realpolitik’ (as in rationalist theories of Classical Realism and Neorealism) legitimizes the exercise of power in international politics even if it has antagonistic tensions with abstract moral-ethical concerns, whereas ‘moralpolitik’ (as in reflectivist theories of Critical International Theory, Feminism, Postmodernism etc.) does not legitimize the exercise of power in international politics if it has antagonistic tensions with abstract moral-ethical concerns. Counter to these diverged doctrines in Eurocentric IR, this chapter sets out to install Aśoka’s Mauryan Empire as a peculiar meeting point of the ‘commonalities’ between two ancient Indian political thoughts: (i) ‘Kautilyan’ (usually depicted as realpolitik); and (ii) ‘Buddhist’ (generally accepted as moralpolitik).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.