Katheterbasierte Luftstrommessung zur Beurteilung der Kollateralventilation: Kein Unterschied zwischen Spontanatmung und HF-Jetventilation

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Endobronchial valve therapy has proven to reduce lung hyperinflation and decrease disease burden in patients with severe lung emphysema. Exclusion of collateral ventilation (CV) of the targeted lobe by using an endobronchial assessment system (Chartis; PulmonX, Drive Redwood City, CA, USA) in combination with software-based fissure integrity analysis (FCS [fissure completeness score]) of computed tomography scans of the lung are established tools to select appropriate patients for endobronchial valve treatment. So far, there is no conclusive evidence if the ventilation mode during bronchoscopy impacts the outcome of Chartis assessments. <b>Methods:</b> Patients with Chartis assessments and software-based quantification of FCS (StratX; PulmonX, Drive Redwood City, CA, USA) were enrolled in this retrospective study. During bronchoscopy, pulmonary fissure integrity was evaluated with the Chartis assessment system in each patient first under spontaneous breathing and subsequently under high-frequency (HF) jet ventilation. <b>Results:</b> In total, 102 patients were analyzed. Four Chartis phenotypes CV positive (CV+), CV negative (CV-), low flow, and low plateau in spontaneous breathing and HF jet ventilation were identified. The frequency of each Chartis phenotype per lobe was similar in both settings. When comparing Chartis assessments in spontaneous breathing and HF jet ventilation, there was an overall good concordance rate for all analyzed fissures. In agreement, receiver operating characteristic analysis of the FCS showed an almost similar prediction for CV+ and CV- status independent of the ventilation modes. <b>Conclusion:</b> Chartis assessment in spontaneous breathing and HF jet ventilation had similar rates in detecting CV in lung emphysema. Our results suggest that both modes are equivalent for the assessment of CV.