Abstract
The Southern Journal of PhilosophyVolume 29, Issue 4 p. 501-520 KANT'S NEGLECTED ARGUMENT AGAINST CONSEQUENTIALISM* Gilbert Plumer, Gilbert Plumer Newtown, Pennsylvania Gilbert Plumer is a Senior Item Analyst for the LSAT—Logical Reasoning at Law School Admission Services, Newtown, PA. He has taught at Illinois State University and at the University of Wisconsin - Oshkosh. His papers have appeared in such journals as Mind, Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, and The Southern Journal of Philosophy.Search for more papers by this author Gilbert Plumer, Gilbert Plumer Newtown, Pennsylvania Gilbert Plumer is a Senior Item Analyst for the LSAT—Logical Reasoning at Law School Admission Services, Newtown, PA. He has taught at Illinois State University and at the University of Wisconsin - Oshkosh. His papers have appeared in such journals as Mind, Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, and The Southern Journal of Philosophy.Search for more papers by this author First published: Winter 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1991.tb00606.x * I am grateful to Marcia Baron, Christine M. Korsgaard, D. S. Shwayder, and Mark Timmons for helpful comments on an earlier draft. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Volume29, Issue4Winter 1991Pages 501-520 RelatedInformation
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
