Abstract

The dissertation explores three different interpretations of the “humanity” which Kant claims is the basis of the innate right to freedom. It argues against two interpretations which fail to fully appreciate the metaphysical and normative underpinnings of the sense of humanity which Kant takes to ground the innate right. It then argues for a view on which moral personality, our capacity for morally responsible agency which presupposes transcendental freedom, is the foundation of the innate right to freedom

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call