Kant의 ‘판단력’과 Hirst의 ‘지식의 형식으로서의 예술’ 논의에 비추어 본 예술지식의 교육적 전달 가능성

Abstract

This study focused on the educability of artistic knowledge regarding Hirst’s theory of seven forms of knowledge. The judgment of Kant, particularly his reflective judgement, can throw light on the possibility that it enables us to acquire artistic knowledge and experiences and to communicate this knowledge in terms of artistic works as a unique form of knowledge. This leads us to the universality of artistic knowledge, as dubbed “public discourse” by Hirst. It should be noted that “articulation” in the forms of mathematic and scientific knowledge is quite different from “language” which can include any meaningful expressions from human activities. Along with Kant’s tone, the practical possibility of Hirst’s forms of artistic knowledge has been found in the Oakeshott’s “judgment” contrast to “information”, and also in accounting for three boundaries of cognition which has been initially originated from Eastern systems of thought including Taoism, as has been shown in the paper.