KANSURVIVE: Testing a telementoring model for improving cancer survivorship care in rural practice.

Abstract

e13791 Background: Cancer survivors require long-term, coordinated care to address the physical, emotional, and psychosocial effects of cancer and its treatment. KanSurvive, a single arm feasibility trial, evaluated the effectiveness of the KanSurvive ECHO intervention combined with practice facilitation (PF) to promote better adoption of evidence-based practice (EBP) survivorship care guidelines for breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer among rural survivors. Methods: Fifteen primary care clinics in Kansas (80% in RUCA codes 4-10), including 62 healthcare professionals, were invited to participate in four, 1-hour Project ECHO telementoring program held in 2021. Real-time videoconferencing sessions covered EBP survivorship guidelines for breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer. Clinics used brief plan-do-study-act cycles with PF supporting implementation of the quality improvement process. Utilizing the National Quality Forum framework, a performance indicator booklet with established measures in preventive health and cancer survivorship was developed as a data collection and quality improvement resource. Performance indicators included EBP screening actions related to cancer surveillance, lifestyle factors, distress, evidence of a review of family history of cancer, and the patient’s cancer diagnosis documented in the EHR. Results: Three clinics (7 = healthcare professionals) withdrew from the project citing competing demands and a provider leaving the practice. The COVID-19 pandemic delayed project initiation and prevented clinic visits. Recruitment and study procedures were implemented remotely. Clinic staff identified 138 cancer survivors (M = 13, IQR [6-16] per practice) seen in the year pre-intervention, and 129 survivors in the year prior to post-intervention. Pre-intervention, overall tumor surveillance was 91%, but lung cancer surveillance was lower than other tumor types at 70%. Other than surveillance, measures of baseline performance were similar across tumor types: screening for distress 84%, assessment of BMI 97%, screening for tobacco use 83% and documentation of family history 70%. Post-intervention performance indicators were similar except for documentation of family history which increased to 89% (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Standardized survivorship metrics can facilitate quality assessment as part of an ECHO-based cancer survivorship program. Although there are modest opportunities for improvement, PCPs in this study caring for rural patients perform reasonably well across a variety of cancer survivorship performance metrics comparable to national primary care quality measures. Documented assessment of family history of cancer lags other metrics and improved after participation in the KanSurvive telementoring program.