Abstract
The shaping of a politician’s image may be considered in terms of various research aspects. The purpose of this article is to draw attention to the issue of the use of communication strategies from the fields of PR and political marketing in the context of building a negative message, using the following mechanisms: anomie, conspiracy theory – political paranoia and political lies. From a psychological point of view, anomie can mean “a dearth of sense, a dearth of meaning”. The cause of this phenomenon is always sought for outside ourselves, in states of confusion and disorientation, when we want to find those guilty of an event/socio-political situation. These treatments are frequently combined with the building of a “conspiracy theory”. They appear at specific moments in history, or in specific socio-political formations. They may relate to the collective mentality (operating on the principle of legends or myths). In the analysed context, they are states of consciousness of an individual who also performs important public and political functions. Their use in a political creation consists primarily of finding, for oneself and others, the existence of a collective enemy and fighting it. The result of this approach is the creation of the phenomenon of “political paranoia” as a particular way of thinking about politics. Another element of this puzzle is the articulation by politicians of a political lie. This phenomenon (according to definition) occurs when someone utters a claim that s/he knows or suspects is false, in the hope that others will consider it to be true. Lying is an action deliberately aimed to deceive the target audience. When we add to these phenomena colouring, free juggling of data, numbers, sentences, examples and concealing, and hiding information that could strengthen or weaken someone's position, we obtain the full suite of tools used in creating the media image of a politician, party, or politics in the broad sense. The phenomena analysed constitute an important contribution to research on the problem of mediatisation (medialisation) of social life, culture, and politics.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.