Kaiser score diagnosis of breast MRI lesions: Factors associated with false-negative and false-positive results

Abstract

PurposeWe sought factors associated with false-negative and false-positive results in the diagnosis of breast lesions using the Kaiser score (KS) on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1058 patients with 1058 breast lesions who underwent preoperative breast MRI with successful histopathologic results. Two radiologists assessed each lesion according to KS criteria, and clinicopathologic features and MRI findings were analyzed. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with false-negative and false-positive KS results. ResultsOf the 1058 lesions, 859 were malignant and 199 were benign. Particularly high misdiagnosis rates were observed for intraductal papilloma, inflammatory lesion, and mucinous carcinoma. For breast cancer, KS yielded 821 (95.6 %) true-positive and 38 (4.4 %) false-negative results. Multivariate analysis showed that smaller lesion size (≤1 cm) (OR, 3.698; 95 %CI, 1.430–9.567; p = 0.007), absence of ipsilateral breast hypervascularity (OR, 3.029; 95 %CI, 1.370–6.693; p = 0.006), and presence of hyperintensity on T2WI (OR, 2.405; 95 %CI, 1.121–5.162; p = 0.024) were significantly associated with false-negative breast cancer results. For benign lesions, KS yielded 141 (70.9 %) true-negative and 58 (29.1 %) false-positive results. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that non-mass enhancement lesions (OR, 4.660; 95 %CI, 2.018–10.762; p＜0.001), moderate/high background parenchymal enhancement (OR, 2.402; 95 %CI, 1.180–4.892; p = 0.016), and the presence of hyperintensity on T2WI (OR, 2.986; 95 %CI, 1.386–6.433; p = 0.005) were significantly associated with false-positive KS results. ConclusionSeveral clinicopathologic and MRI features influence the accuracy of KS diagnosis. Understanding these factors may facilitate appropriate use of KS and guide alternative diagnostic approaches, ultimately improving diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of breast lesions.