Abstract

Attempts to estimate and identify factors influencing first-year survival in passerines, survival between fledging and the first reproductive attempt (i.e. juvenile survival), have largely been confounded by natal dispersal, particularly in long-distance migratory passerines. We studied Prothonotary Warblers (Protonotaria citrea) breeding in nest boxes to estimate first-year survival while accounting for biases related to dispersal that are common in mark-recapture studies. The natal dispersal distribution (median = 1420 m; n = 429) and a distance-dependent recruitment rate, which controls for effects of study site configuration, both indicated a pattern of short-distance natal dispersal. This pattern was consistent with results of a systematic survey for birds returning outside the nest box study sites (up to 30 km in all directions) within a majority (81%) of total available bottomland forest habitat, further suggesting that permanent emigration outside of the study system was rare. We used multistate mark-recapture modeling to estimate first-year survival and incorporated factors thought to influence survival while accounting for the potential confounding effects of dispersal on recapture probabilities for warblers that fledged during 2004–2009 (n = 6093). Overall, the average first-year survival for warblers reared without cowbird nestmates was 0.11 (95% CI = 0.09–0.13), decreased with fledging date (0.22 early to 0.03 late) and averaged 40% lower for warblers reared with a brood parasite nestmate. First-year survival was less than half of the rate thought to represent population replacement in migratory passerines (∼0.30). This very low rate suggests that surviving the first year of life for many Neotropical migratory species is even more difficult than previously thought, forcing us to rethink estimates used in population models.

Highlights

  • Quantifying age-specific survival is necessary to identify factors affecting population growth and to model population dynamics

  • As natal dispersal may lead to considerable rates of permanent emigration, from study systems limited in size, first-year survival estimates are thought to be biased low

  • In lieu of reliable estimates of first-year survival, population modelers have used theoretical values thought to represent adequate population-level replacement rates, such as one-half of adult survival, or,0.30 ([13,14] reviewed by [12]). We found both the mean (0.11+0.01) and maximum first-year survival estimates for non-parasitized Prothonotary Warblers to be much less than the expected rate of first-year survival for a migratory passerine

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Quantifying age-specific survival is necessary to identify factors affecting population growth and to model population dynamics. High mortality rates soon after fledging [7,8] and natal dispersal typically confound efforts to accurately quantify first-year survival [9]. Small body size prevents using radiotelemetry technology to estimate annual survival. Markrecapture methods are used to estimate survival of small avian species while accounting for imperfect detection [10]. One limitation of mark-recapture methods for estimating first-year survival is that there is no way to differentiate between permanent emigration and mortality [9]. As natal dispersal may lead to considerable rates of permanent emigration, from study systems limited in size, first-year survival estimates are thought to be biased low

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call