Abstract
An analysis of Justice Windeyer's well-known obiter dictum in 'Victoria v Commonwealth' concerning the 'Engineers' Case' is presented. It is argued that Windeyer J's views regarding the basic structure of the Constitution lacked coherence. Three theoretical possibilities that could explain the apparent inconsistencies in his dictum are considered.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
