Abstract
Motivation/Background: The legal problems found in providing compensation in land acquisition for the public interest are vague norms in the interests of justice and feasibility. The legislation on land acquisition has not explained the provision of compensation fairly and adequately. Method: This research uses normative legal analysis. Results: This includes that the perspective of fairness in compensation for land acquisition is essentially still characterized by pragmatic development programs and conditions for compensation that the government has determined. Conclusions: This shows that the provision of compensation must refer to the theory of justice, the idea of practicality and the theory of legal certainty to realize the nature of a prosperous legal state based on Indonesian Socialism and Pancasila.
Highlights
Proper land use can provide benefits, one of which is in the tourism industry Riyadi et al (2019) and impact on economic stability Warjiyati et al (2020)
It is analysed based on the doctrinal principles of legal theories, especially on the nature of justice and the concepts of national agrarian law. It is to interpret the provisions of land acquisition, especially in the fairness of giving compensation. It can be concluded and formulate arrangements for the provision of compensation in land acquisition based on the values of justice
The meaning of justice is analysed in the theory of legal objectives
Summary
Proper land use can provide benefits, one of which is in the tourism industry Riyadi et al (2019) and impact on economic stability Warjiyati et al (2020). The term "verbonding" refers to a letter tax bill on land ownership. The type of land rights known as property rights is the most powerful. The law will no longer protect other land rights and these types of property rights if it doesn't have certificate evidence Iskandar (2019). The term "property rights" stems from the Dutch word "Eigendom," while "ownership" is used in the Dutch language Anatami (2017). Against the thing with complete sovereignty, as long as it does not contradict general laws or regulations enacted by a competent body determine it. They do not infringe on other people's rights Simanjuntak (2015)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
