Abstract

Previous research showed justice sensitivity (JS) – the tendency to perceive and negatively respond to injustice as a victim, observer, or perpetrator – to be reliably and validly measurable in middle childhood, but unexpected findings concerning mean values and measurement invariance (MI) require replication, and retest reliabilities, longitudinal relations with prosocial and aggressive behavior, and relations with teacher ratings are currently unknown. This study, therefore, examined mean values, factor structure, retest reliabilities, and MI of self- and parent-rated JS as well as their relations with parent- and teacher-rated prosocial and aggressive behavior and a range of social skills in a sample of 1,329 children between 5 and 12 years of age (first measurement: M = 8.05, SD = 1.02, 51.1% girls). Using self- and parent ratings, we could replicate the intended factor structure of three related yet distinct JS subscales (victim, observer, and perpetrator). We found strong MI between those ratings. Retest reliabilities of parent ratings were similar to older age groups, but lower for self-ratings. All JS perspectives were positively related with theory of mind and empathy, indicating a good understanding of others’ internal states. Victim JS was negatively related to affective and behavioral self-regulation, whereas observer and perpetrator JS showed positive relations. Victim JS negatively and observer and perpetrator JS positively predicted prosocial behavior. The opposite pattern was found regarding aggressive behavior. This study provides additional support that JS can be measured via self- and other reports in childhood and that it may influence behavior early on. It adds to explaining the relations with prosocial and aggressive behavior.

Highlights

  • Research showed that differences in the tendency to perceive and adversely respond to injustice – justice sensitivity (JS) – can be measured from middle childhood onward (Strauß et al, 2020)

  • This study examined whether the findings on JS in middle childhood in previous research can be replicated in an independent sample, and studied retest reliabilities, longitudinal relations between JS and prosocial and aggressive behavior, and cross-sectional associations with a broad range of social skills rated by parents and teachers

  • We examined measurement invariance (MI) between selfand parent ratings using the proportion of maximum scaling (POMS) method (Little, 2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research showed that differences in the tendency to perceive and adversely respond to injustice – justice sensitivity (JS) – can be measured from middle childhood onward (Strauß et al, 2020). Some of these findings, contrasted findings in older age groups or theoretical assumptions underlying JS and require replication. Retest reliabilities and longitudinal associations with behavior were not yet examined in children. Given that trait measurement in children is often challenging, it is important to ensure that JS can be reliably and validly measured before using the measure in further research

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call