Abstract

The present study examined the fairness judgements and reasoning offered by children and adolescents in the context of the division of household labour among siblings. The data were examined for grade level differences in the endorsement of three distributive justice principles (equality, equity and need). Male and female third grade, sixth grade and ninth grade participants were read a total of six stories, each describing four siblings engaged in household chores. Two stories each represented the principles of equality, equity and need. Participants indicated how fair they thought the division of chores was using a 5‐point Likert scale, and then provided a rationale for each fairness rating. Findings indicated endorsement of the equality principle by the majority of participants, regardless of grade level. Analyses also revealed that the sixth graders were the least likely to view as fair a division of labour based on need. Overall, the study's findings support the notion that the endorsement of the principles of justice depends on the circumstances of the situation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.