Justice for the Welfare Recipient: Fair Hearings in AFDC: The Wisconsin Experience

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessJustice for the Welfare Recipient: Fair Hearings in AFDC: The Wisconsin ExperienceJoel F. HandlerJoel F. Handler Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Social Service Review Volume 43, Number 1Mar., 1969 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/642325 Views: 1Total views on this site Citations: 14Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1969 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Vicki Lens In the Fair Hearing Room: Resistance and Confrontation in the Welfare Bureaucracy, Law & Social Inquiry 32, no.22 (Jun 2008): 309–332.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2007.00061.xVicki Lens Administrative Justice in Public Welfare Bureaucracies, Administration & Society 39, no.33 (May 2007): 382–408.https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707301006 Vicki Lens and Susan Elizabeth Vorsanger Complaining after Claiming: Fair Hearings after Welfare Reform Lens and Vorsanger, Social Service Review 79, no.33 (Jul 2015): 430–453.https://doi.org/10.1086/430892Janet A. Gilboy Administrative Review in a System of Conflicting Values, Law <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Social Inquiry 13, no.33 (Jul 1988): 515–579.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1988.tb00060.xWilliam Austin, Joyce M. Tobiasen Legal Justice and the Psychology of Conflict Resolution, (Jan 1984): 227–274.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2683-0_8Susan Clayton Social Need Revisited, Journal of Social Policy 12, no.0202 (Jan 2009): 215.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279400012617 References, (Jan 1979): 149–154.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-322848-2.50014-5 Ronald Randall Social Services in AFDC: Steps toward Evaluation, Social Service Review 49, no.22 (Sep 2015): 191–207.https://doi.org/10.1086/643234 Mark Tushnet The Newer Property: Suggestion for the Revival of Substantive Due Process, The Supreme Court Review 1975 (Sep 2015): 261–288.https://doi.org/10.1086/scr.1975.3108813RICHARD M. TITMUSS WELFARE "RIGHTS", LAW AND DISCRETION, The Political Quarterly 42, no.22 (Apr 1971): 113–132.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1971.tb00061.xStewart Macaulay, Elaine Walster Legal Structures and Restoring Equity, Journal of Social Issues 27, no.22 (Apr 1971): 173–188.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1971.tb00659.xKathleen Bell Administrative Tribunals Since Franks, Social Policy & Administration 4, no.44 (Oct 1970).https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.1970.tb00612.x Joel F. Handler , and Ellen Jane Hollingsworth The Administration of Social Services and the Structure of Dependency: The Views of AFDC Recipients, Social Service Review 43, no.44 (Sep 2015): 406–420.https://doi.org/10.1086/642440 Margaret K. Rosenheim Shapiro v. Thompson: "The Beggars Are Coming to Town", The Supreme Court Review 1969 (Sep 2015): 303–346.https://doi.org/10.1086/scr.1969.3108680