Abstract

Current theories of control draw on the concept of “visibility” to theorise the potential for “action at a distance” and so explain the use of control technologies in organizations. However, theorising action at a distance should not itself be reliant on researchers viewing actors from a distance. For example, Boland (1993) argues that some theorists, in viewing the actor from a distance, tend to portray management accounting as a “monolithic set of structuring properties”. This is no small difficulty, but represents a failure to date for institutional analysis to accommodate the “strategic conduct” (Giddens, 1984) of actors within conditions of distanciation. In overlooking strategic conduct, current theories overlook a transmutation of control techniques into communication practices and fail to explain the existence of a multiplicity of control technologies. The thesis of this paper is that members of organizations consume control technologies for “moves” within language games (Lyotard, 1984) with, for example, managers moving from production numbers to accounting numbers in order to sustain a position of domination over subordinates. The contribution of the paper is not aimed at overthrowing the thesis of action at a distance, rather it is intended to illustrate how this thesis may require extension to reconcile with the everyday strategic conduct of actors.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.