Abstract
As decided by the ECJ, legal privilege does not extend to in-house lawyers in antitrust investigations carried out by the Commission. The decision creates a discrepancy with national investigations as that extension is accepted in some countries. It further creates unease for companies taking advice from in-house lawyers, which may compromise their role in ensuring compliance. It raises questions as to why ‘enrolled in-house lawyers’ should remain subject to ethical and discipline rules applicable to external lawyers as their communications do not benefit from the same protection.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of European Competition Law & Practice
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
