Abstract
deal with jurors' reactions to alternative legal criteria of responsibility in a sequence of experimental cases involving a plea of insanity. The present discussion will be limited to comments and impressions relevant to jurors' assessment of responsibility in the first of these jury experiments. The problem as we have approached it may be divided into three sections: the legal and historical background, the research design, and the data.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
