Abstract
Kurt Lipstein’s involvement as counsel in Nottebohm on diplomatic protection before the International Court of Justice demonstrated to him the limitations of international justice. Changing concepts of state sovereignty, individual rights, jurisdiction, procedure and evidence are incrementally remedying these limitations. This article shows how international law provides more effective protection of individual rights, mainly through the analysis of the Diallo case of 2010.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
