Abstract
This research aims to analize the appointment of an ex-convict of corruption to be a Commissioner of BUMN and the subsidiary company of BUMN from a legal perspective and its implication for Good Corporate Governance Practices. The result showed that the appointment of an ex-convict of corruption to be a Commissioner of BUMN and the subsidiary company of BUMN is considered as a violation of law because it doesn’t fulfill the Integrity aspect. The violation of integrity showed that Good Corporate Governance is not fully materialized in a corporate practice, especially BUMN and the subsidiary company of BUMN.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
