Abstract

This article, which examines domestic juridical double and economic triple taxation of shareholder loans, concludes that such taxation (i) can result in an effective top marginal tax rate exceeding 100%; (ii) raises issues under, for example, the European Convention on Human Rights (right to property); and (iii) represents, for the individual, a form of “cum in”, i.e. the equivalent of the “cum ex” that was the basis of a major tax fraud scandal in Europe.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call