Juridical Analysis of the Legal Results of the Binding Agreement of Sale and Purchase with a Deed under the Hand Endorsed by a Notary after the Judge's Decision Number 54 /PDT.G/2014/PN.PDG

Abstract

Notary is authorized to authorize the letter under hand (legalization). The legalization process is a letter made under the hand signed by the parties before the Notary and the notary register the deed into a special book, for example a binding sale and purchase agreement. The author is interested in discuss1) What is behind the occurrence of the case Decision Number 54 /Pdt.G/2014/PN.Pdg? 2)How the judge's consideration of the sale and purchase agreement binding made and approved by the notary in the case Decision Number 54 /Pdt.G/2014 /PN.Pdg? The research method used is the method of juridical normative empirical approach. The result of the research 1) The background of the occurrence of the Decision Number 54 /Pdt.G/2014/PN.Pdg is that Defendant I did not carry out the payment of the Plaintiff's land sale and purchase of the above land, both the second term and the third termin payment, causing such a large loss Plaintiffs, such losses include the Plaintiff can not utilize the land sale money optimally, the Plaintiff has sought constantly to pursue the path of peace to find a way of settlement but Defendant I always tried to dodge so as not to meet common ground, 2) Judge's consideration of the binding agreement Sale and purchase made and approved by a notary in the case of Decision Number 54 /Pdt.G/2014/PN.Pdg is the object of PPJB is a plot of land that has been certified shall be held a local examination by the Assembly, the TRTB Service does not issue permits for the location of housing on land SHM .No.4065 / Balai Gadang with the reason that evidently the land is located just above the ground which is the plan of the road or in the area of the eastern ring road of the city of Padang. This is contrary to the IPPT issued by the Land Office of Padang City and the Sale and Purchase of Land of SHM.No.4065 / Balai Gadang has been declared void in accordance with the provisions of Article 5 of the Agreement dated September 13, 2013, that both parties agree to the costs incurred in The process of reversing the name of the land certificate either on a Notary which makes the deed or administrative process in the Land Affairs office of Padang city. Therefore, please punish the plaintiff for reconstruction and defendant to pay as much (50% each) the costs incurred in the process behind the name SHM.No.4065 / Balai Gadang.