Abstract
Introduction to the Problem: One example of regulations in the economic field is Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). The Copyright Law has been amended many times, even within a period of approximately twenty years, the relevant law has changed four times. The purpose of the law is justice, legal certainty and expediency, thus giving the desire to review the Copyright Law to be able to realize the legal objectives. Objectives/Study Objectives: This paper aims to determine the Juridical Analysis of the Development of Copyright Law in Relation to Legal Objectives Design/Methodology/Approach: This paper is included in the type of normative legal research which provides a prescriptive on Juridical Analysis of the Development of Copyright Law in Relation to Legal Objectives. The technique of collecting legal materials is carried out by studying literature to collect legal materials by reading laws and regulations, official documents and literature related to problems that must be carried out by the author. The legal material analysis technique is carried out qualitatively Findings: The results show that, the purpose of the law is as a social engineering tool, so that the Intellectual Property Rights Act is also a social engineering tool aimed at making people obey the law in the direction of a law-abiding society in the field of IPR is not yet optimal. The development of the Copyright Law in law with legal objectives can be seen from the legal substance, legal structure, and Indonesian culture.
Highlights
Introduction to the ProblemOne example of regulations in the economic field is Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
The Form of Justice in the Copyright Law In 1987, Government of Indonesia to change the Law of Copyright Year 1982 to put forward four basic wishful law contained in mukadimahnya: 1. The provision of legal protection for copyright is intended as an effort to create a better climate for the growth and development of a passion for creativity in the fields of science, art and literature; 2
In terms of legal culture, the Law of Copyright has changed from year to year 5 times accompanied by sanctions is augmented and diperlkuas scope, it is not to scare the people of Indonesia to remain in violation of a work of creation such as piracy CDs, VCDs, DVDs, download songs or movies on the Internet
Summary
Introduction to the ProblemOne example of regulations in the economic field is Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). The legal material analysis technique is carried out qualitatively Findings: The results show that, the purpose of the law is as a social engineering tool, so that the Intellectual Property Rights Act is a social engineering tool aimed at making people obey the law in the direction of a law-abiding society in the field of IPR is not yet optimal. As well as repressive measures to prevent and overcome copyright infringement that can harm the creator and the state. This change in law should be directed at the creation of a legal system that allows the people's basic rights to be respected, fulfilled and protected.(Benuf, 2018). That the benefits of the Copyright Law can not be fully enjoyed by the community
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
