Abstract

Abstract
 This study aims to find out what is the reason for the Bandung District Court judge in canceling the death sentence and chemical castration to the Defendant in the Case of Sexual Violence against Children, then to find out the reason the Judge only gave life imprisonment and a fine. The research method in this thesis is normative juridical which aims to examine a court decision or decision on Decision No. 989/Pid.S/2021/PN.Bdg. The results obtained are that the Bandung District Court Judge related to the Child Sexual Violence Case decided to cancel the decision on the death penalty and chemical castration in Decision Number 989/Pid.S/2021/PN.Bdg for several reasons. The cancellation occurred because the Defendant still has human rights that cannot be eliminated by the Judge, therefore the Judge imposes Compensation for the Defendant which will be given to the Victim. The cancellation was what changed the criminal sentence against the Defendant who was initially sentenced to Article 81 paragraph (1), paragraph (3), paragraph (5) jo. Article 76 D of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 17 of 2006 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No.1 of 2016 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection to become Law Jo Article 65 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code becomes life imprisonment and a fine of Rp. 331.527,186,- (three hundred and thirty-one million five hundred twenty-seven thousand one hundred and eighty-six rupiah).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.