Abstract
Banking institutions have an important role in economic development with lending activities regulated in credit agreements. In the credit agreement between PT. BRI Agro Niaga Pekanbaru and PT. Sipakko Jaya Abadi with PTPN V there are efforts to secure credit with collateral and cessie required as collateral. This study uses empirical normative legal research methods. The data used include primary, secondary and tertiary data. Collecting data using library research and field research with interviews. Furthermore, the data were analyzed using qualitative data analysis methods. The results of the study indicate that the credit agreement between PT. BRI Agro Niaga Pekanbaru and PT. Sipakko Jaya Abadi has complied with the legal basis in force in Indonesia and the legal relationship that exists between PT. BRI Agro Niaga Pekanbaru as creditor and PT. Sipako Jaya Abadi as the debtor with PTPN V as the third party is PT. Sipakko Jaya Abadi entered into a credit agreement with PT. BRI Agro Niaga Pekanbaru with the aim of financing the work contract with PTPN V. The implementation of the Mortgage Guarantee with the required cessie as collateral is not in accordance with the legal basis and because essentially the cessie is a transfer of receivables. The execution of the guarantee in the credit agreement cannot be carried out on the cessie required as collateral.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.