Abstract

This study sought to examine whether junior high school teachers’ attitudes are enabling or disabling dispositions toward inquiry-based science teaching. We used concurrent triangulation mixed methods design involving surveys and multiple case studies to collect quantitative and qualitative data. We sampled 308 integrated science teachers and a subsample of 18 teachers from junior high schools in urban and rural areas. Validity and reliability of the questionnaire were satisfactory for research. Credibility and dependability of the semi-structured interview schedule were also sufficient. Findings suggest that most junior high school teachers in the study context hold weak unfavourable attitudes that are disabling dispositions toward inquiry-based science teaching. Findings also suggest that the combination of societal subjective norms, perceived context dependency, and weak unfavourable attitudes of most junior high school teachers adversely influence their intentions and behaviours toward inquiry-based science teaching. Findings further suggest that most teachers in the study context developed weak unfavourable attitudes partly because they never had inquiry-based science teaching and learning experiences when they were students. Again, the teachers developed weak general attitudes toward science teaching partly because most science teaching and learning experiences they had were in specific subjects such as biology, chemistry, and physics instead of general (integrated) science. We recommend frequent attitude-focused inquiry-based science in-service trainings for junior high school teachers. We also recommend reforms in education that engages preservice teachers in attitude-focused inquiry-based science teaching and learning experiences.

Highlights

  • Traditional science instruction largely involves teachers drawing on content and pedagogical content knowledge to transmit scientific knowledge and laboratory procedures for students to receive, memorize, and recall later

  • Most contemporary studies show that teachers must develop strong favourable attitudes to facilitate science teaching, including inquiry-based teaching. (Alake-Tuenter, Biemans, Tobi, & Mulder, 2013; Choi & Ramsey, 2009; Novak & Wisdom, 2018; Park, Chu, & Martin, 2016; Tsybulsky & Oz, 2019; Wilder, Butler, Acharya, & Gill, 2019)

  • Most teachers expressed strong favourable interest in inquiry teaching and agreed that it is exciting 272(88.3%) and easy 192(62.3%) to allow junior high school (JHS) students to manipulate science equipment and materials, and enjoyable 285(92.5%) to allow JHS students to work in groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Traditional science instruction largely involves teachers drawing on content and pedagogical content knowledge to transmit scientific knowledge and laboratory procedures for students to receive, memorize, and recall later. Due to the widely acknowledged effectiveness of inquiry in promoting various learning outcomes and scientific literacy (Furtak, Seidel, Iverson, & Briggs, 2012), curricula reforms to consolidate and enhance inquiry teaching have occurred in places where the culture of inquiry is well established (Chin, 2005; Marec, Tessier, Langlois, & Potvin, 2021; National Research Council [NRC], 2012; Silm, Tiitsaar, Pedaste, Zacharia, & Papaevripidou, 2017). Inquiry-based science teaching involves the engagement of students in relevant, meaningful, interesting, authentic, hands-on, minds-on, and collaborative investigations that are similar to the activities and thinking processes of scientists. In this process teachers facilitate students to ask scientifically-oriented questions about natural phenomena; formulate hypotheses; design and conduct investigations; and collect, analyse, and interpret data. Teachers facilitate students to collaborate with peers and others; communicate and justify investigation procedures and results; search for information from books, internet, articles, and other sources; and to consider alternative procedures and explanations (Furtak et al, 2012; National Research Council [NRC], 1996)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call