Abstract

Senior Instructors and Assistant Professors in their first academic appointment may not have all the tools for an efficient start to their careers. Although many institutions provide access to mentoring programs and seminars on faculty development, the timing and format of the offerings often conflict with ongoing responsibilities of the faculty, particularly clinical faculty. We established a collaboration between the Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) and the University of Rochester Medical Center Office for Faculty Development with the goal of developing a week-long Junior Faculty Core Curriculum that would better suit faculty schedules. We convened focus groups and with their help, identified themes for inclusion in the course. Speakers were identified from among local senior faculty. University leadership was enlisted in promoting the course. Individual speakers and course content were evaluated daily, at the end of the week-long course, and 6 months later. Planning for subsequent years incorporated the feedback. Yearly evaluations and subsequent course modification continued. Junior faculty from nearly every department in the Medical Center were represented. There was high learner satisfaction and participation however several limitations were identified and addressed in subsequent years. The focus on principles and available resources, not specific skills or content was appropriate. Daily interactions among participants from a wide variety of departments fostered networking among faculty who may not otherwise have met and discussed common interests. The ultimate value of such an early, intensive faculty development program will depend on whether it equips junior faculty to organize, develop, and achieve their academic goals better than alternative formats. This will require further study.

Highlights

  • Senior Instructors and Assistant Professors in their first academic appointment may not have all the tools for an efficient start to their careers

  • Junior faculty are often successful graduates of high-quality training programs, but such training programs often fail to address the transition to the faculty role and the added expectations that accompany a faculty position

  • Junior faculty mentorship programs are common at many institutions [1,2,3,4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Strengths ∙ Enrollment of 51 junior faculty (60% women and 40% men) in a week-long course (Chair-approved protected time) from 15 Medical Center departments ∙ Daily/concurrent evaluations of participants attending JFACC were uniformly very positive, especially for interactive sessions ∙ 6-mo evaluations (post-JFACC curriculum) confirmed the value of the curriculum with participants reporting applying the skills and knowledge attained Participants reported a) Greater focus on development of their academic career plan b) Seeking additional mentorship c) Greater ease in networking d) Getting “credit” for their educational activities e) Greater awareness of the range of resources available across the Medical Center ∙ Perceived value of networking lunches with senior and peer faculty. In order to provide the appropriate physical space for concurrent sessions, we asked year 2 participants to provide their home

Methods
Results
Conclusions
∙ Assessing methods
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call