Abstract

Extreme financial events usually lead to sharp jumps in stock prices and volatilities. In addition, jump clustering and stock price correlations contribute to the risk amplification acceleration mechanism during the crisis. In this paper, four Jump-GARCH models are used to forecast the jump diffusion volatility, which is used as the risk factor. The linear and asymmetric nonlinear effects are considered, and the value at risk of banks is estimated by support vector quantile regression. There are three main findings. First, in terms of the volatility process of bank stock price, the Jump Diffusion GARCH model is better than the Continuous Diffusion GARCH model, and the discrete jump volatility is significant. Secondly, due to the difference of the sensitivity of abnormal information shock, the jump behavior of bank stock price is heterogeneous. Moreover, CJ-GARCH models are suitable for most banks, while ARJI-R2-GARCH models are more suitable for small and medium sized banks. Thirdly, based on the jump diffusion volatility information, the performance of the support vector quantile regression is better than that of the parametric quantile regression and nonparametric quantile regression.

Highlights

  • Extreme financial events can trigger a continuous downward jump in stock markets

  • In order to verify the effectiveness of the jump generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH)-support vector quantile regression (SVQR) model in estimating the Value at risk (VaR) of banks, this paper compares the relative effectiveness of the three models by using the Kupiec failure probability test and dynamic quantile test based on parametric quantile regression (QR) and nonparametric QR

  • In order to check the validity of Jump-GARCH-SVQR model, two similar techniques, parametric QR and nonparametric QR, are used to estimate the VaR

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Extreme financial events can trigger a continuous downward jump in stock markets. In June 2015, the deleveraging of China’s A-shares disaster and the “811” exchange rate reform caused the RMB exchange rate to plummet, and the Chinese stock market circuit breaker kicked in four times in the first four days of January 2016, as more than 1000 stocks plunged by 10%, the maximal allowed daily drop. The commonly used methods to measure and estimate volatility are historical volatility, calculated by static average and dynamic moving average; time-varying volatility, estimated by the continuous generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) model [5]; implied volatility, calculated by six variable option pricing system; random volatility, generated by stochastic simulation; and realized volatility, calculated by high-frequency data These methods all assume that the return on assets is a continuous process, and the jump component is not fully considered or is completely ignored. This assumption is not in line with the reality [6], so it cannot well explain the smile phenomenon of volatility and the Risk Amplification Acceleration Mechanism of stock price jumps and its clustering caused by extreme financial events or abnormal information shocks [7,8].

Literature Review on Volatility Prediction
Literature Review on Bank VaR Estimation
Stock Price Jump Identification
Selection of Jump Diffusion Volatility Prediction Model
Jump-GARCH Model
Parameter Estimation of Jump-GARCH Model
Prediction of Jump Diffusion Volatility
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Jump Diffusion Volatility Prediction
Support Vector Quantile Regression Estimation of VaR
Validity Test of VaR Estimation
Failure Probability Test
Dynamic Quantile Test
Sample Data and Descriptive Statistics
Jump Identification and Analysis
Statistics of Jump Diffusion Volatility Forecast Value of Commercial Banks
SVQR Estimation and Analysis of Banks’ Jump Diffusion VaR
Summary and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call