Abstract

The idea of arbitrary detention and how it violates various international protocols is a pressing theme of international juridical and philosophical opinion. Such conduct is an expression of unjustified political control by States over citizens, and speaks to the ever present dangers of power unwatched and unregulated. The political prisoner remains the classic figure of this enterprise, both a target and a threat. What is less examined in this regard is how that control manifests itself, a matter that has proven to be a far more complex affair. This paper examines that debate by looking at the case of Julian Assange and his claim that he is being arbitrarily detained in the Ecuadorean embassy in London. The legal claim that he is not is critiqued as being unduly positivist and in need of correction, referring to the findings of the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention in February 2015.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call