Abstract
I propose a shadow price approach to measuring the stringency of land use regulation. A regulation is considered more restrictive if the land developer is willing to pay a larger amount for a marginal relaxation of the regulation. I show that existing theory-based measures of land use stringency are either equivalents or variations of this shadow price measure. Using data from China, I demonstrate that it is possible to compare the stringency of two kinds of land use regulation, a key advantage of this shadow price approach.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
