Abstract
Judith Butler avoided writing about Henry James early in her career, when her questioning of the homogeneity and legibility of the category of "women" echoed James's similar reflections as he planned The Bostonians. As well as exploring some stylistic affinities between both writers, this essay suggests a Jamesian provenance for Butler's key term "Precarious Life" and looks at how she values the James of Washington Square and The Golden Bowl on largely ethical grounds. It then argues for grounds beyond the ethical for Butler's valuing of James, most notably identification and the relationship between femininity, style and cultural resistance.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
