Abstract
This article intends to analyze the decision-making stages of the judicialization of public health policy in Brazil by the highest legal court in the country — the Supreme Federal Court of Justice (STF). Subsequently, we present the most relevant criticisms of the excessive judicialization of health, attempting, to list alternatives in order to discuss a possible program of improvements for public health policy, having as its main element the dialogue between the Brazilian Justice and Health Systems. The methodology used can be characterized as quali-quantitative, considering that data collection was used on the STF website for research and analysis of judicial decisions, as well as a biographically doctrinaire review.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Ciências e Políticas Públicas / Public Sciences & Policies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
