Abstract

DOI: 10.1590/2179-8966/2018/32267 Resumen En 2010, un fallo judicial inicio un proceso de relocalizacion de los habitantes de los margenes de un rio contaminado en Buenos Aires. Reticentes a acatarlo sin hacer valer su voz, los afectados convocaron a la Defensoria General de la Ciudad, organismo paradigmatico del creciente “activismo judicial”. El objetivo de este articulo es examinar el discurso y las estrategias de los defensores publicos, asi como analizar las formas en que entran en contacto las logicas politica y juridica de construccion y tramitacion de las demandas de la poblacion riberena. Palabras clave: defensa publica; relocalizaciones; activismo judicial. Abstract In 2010, a judicial sentence initiated a resettlement process of the people who lived on the border of a polluted river in Buenos Aires. Reluctant to accept it without making themselves heard, they involved the Public Defender’s Office, whose practices are paradigmatic of a growing ‘judicial activism’. The goal of this article is to examine this attorneys’ discourse and strategies as well as to analyze the ways in which the political and juridical logics articulate in the conflict over the riverside dweller’s demands. Keywords: public defenders; resettlements; judicial activism.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call