Abstract
Abstract Few cows are more sacred than judicial independence, yet the concept of an independent judiciary is more commonly apotheosized than analyzed. This article explains how the concept of judicial independence is much more complicated and ambiguous than it is often regarded. After reviewing and explicating the literature on judicial independence, it analyzes the meaning of judicial independence and then considers the degree to which the judiciary is independent, focusing on the federal judiciary of the United States. Independence plays an important role in a system of governance, but it is reasonably compromised to some degree by concerns for judicial accountability. In the United States, federal judges are essentially, but imperfectly, independent. The article proceeds to consider the sources of judicial independence. Although constitutional protections may have some value, the root of independence may derive from the interests of other political institutions. Finally, it considers the implications of judicial selection and retention, with a focus on the U.S. states, which provide a convenient testing ground.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.