Abstract
This article examines the amendments to the crime of aggression passed during the International Criminal Court Review Conference from the perspective of some of the human rights organizations engaged in the discussion. The authors find that the Kampala compromise has not realized the worst fears voiced by these civil society organizations before and during the Review Conference. Nonetheless, there is cause for concern as regards the amendment's effect on the standards of independence and integrity of the ICC, especially its Office of the Prosecutor. States parties have introduced a jurisdictional procedure that allows the United Nations Security Council to have a significant impact on the Court by expanding the reach of Article 16 of the Rome Statute, even though three of the permanent members have failed to ratify the Statute. The authors perceive the risks of increased selectivity and political interference in the decision-making of the Court in the future.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
