Abstract

Using Chinese A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2016, we consider the establishment of China's National Circuit Courts as a quasi-natural experiment and empirically investigate the impact of judicial independence on the decisions of growth investors using the difference-in-difference (DID) method. Our findings suggest that judicial independence significantly facilitates growth investors' investment in local firms. This effect mainly stems from the reduction of business risks and the promotion of corporate innovation. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that judicial independence has a stronger promoting effect on growth investors' investment in firms in high-tech, high-growth, and poor initial legal environment.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.