Abstract

Problem settings. The right to peaceful assembly is a basic system of political rights of citizens of Ukraine as a means, and, unfortunately, sometimes, and the last real opportunity to convey their views or influence the activities of the public authorities, the judicial protection in practice it turns out one of the main guarantees of their implementation. Recent research and publications analysis. To the analysis judicial guarantees the right to peaceful assembly, in particular, such researchers applied as Barabash Y., Shevchuk S., Severin S.Paper main body. In the article the problem of protecting the right to peaceful assembly by means of constitutional justice, courts of law and practice of the European Court of Human Rights on the implementation of this law. The conclusion is that since this right is a basic system of political rights of citizens of Ukraine as a means, and, unfortunately, sometimes, and the last real opportunity to convey their views or influence the activities of the public authorities, the judicial protection in practice it turns out one of the main guarantees of their implementation. It is reported that currently in Ukraine a special law that regulates social relations in the field of freedom of assembly in our legislation today is not that the main obstacle to the free exercise their right to peaceful assembly in practice and the existence of controversial judicial practice protection of constitutional law. It is in this legal act must be resolved problems in terms of notification of peaceful assembly, their shape, mass, time and place of the meeting. Conclusions of the research. The main problem that must be solved by law - it dates subject of the public authorities to hold a peaceful assembly. Another problem in the regulation of relations in the sphere of peaceful assembly is a clear definition of grounds and rules limiting the realization of political freedom.

Highlights

  • (справа щодо завчасного сповіщення про мирні зібрання) Конституційний Суд України підкреслив значення цього права як однієї з конституційних гарантій права громадянина на свободу свого світогляду і віросповідання, думки і слова, Остапенко В

  • The main problem that must be solved by law

  • it dates subject of the public authorities to hold a peaceful assembly

Read more

Summary

Introduction

(справа щодо завчасного сповіщення про мирні зібрання) Конституційний Суд України підкреслив значення цього права як однієї з конституційних гарантій права громадянина на свободу свого світогляду і віросповідання, думки і слова, Остапенко В. 39 Конституції України хоча і визначає правило про завчасне сповіщення органів державної влади або органів місцевого самоврядування про проведення мирного зібрання, проте не визначає конкретних строків.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.