Abstract
Conceptualizing legal education in Africa according to western legal thought and theories has been a major setback in the manner that indigenous African law has been theorized in legal scholarship. This affects how it has been interpreted and applied by courts in its exercise of judicial discretion which is a field that is yet to be adequately explored with respect to the application of indigenous law by courts in a pluralistic legal system. This paper presents, based on empirical data, a theoretical basis for the utilization of judicial discretion in the ascertainment and application of indigenous law by formal courts in Nigeria and South Africa and offers an analysis using relevant legal doctrines of centralism, realism and pluralism. At the core of the analysis is Hart’s extrapolation of the conception of law and the place of judicial discretion and how indigenous law fits into it despite its exclusion by Hart.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
