Abstract
This paper reviews a selection of influential studies on judgment of covariation in order to examine how accurate are people’s covariation judgments in general, and how sophisticated are the strategies they use to make those judgments. Very different answers have been given to these questions, depending on several factors, including the method that is used to assess people’s performance on these tasks, and the motivation that people to have to reach certain conclusions. It is argued that, although people are often quite poor at judging covariation, they are flexible in the strategies that they use to do so, and they have the potential to use sophisticated strategies and make accurate judgments when certain conditions are met.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
