Abstract
Many people think and talk about judging poems. Fewer actually do it, and these are usually editors. At its best editing is a self-effacing activity. The editor selects and presents, showing his literary criteria by example, not arguing the reader into appreciation as the critic often does. By this silence, however, judging can take on more mystery than it deserves. Put simply, those who judge routinely seldom theorize about it, and those who do theorize about judging rarely judge. Perhaps for good reason, since judging poems tends to be an intuitive process. The editor's intuitions need sound critical foundations, but because judgments don't require reasons submitted as proof, intuition can be a reliable and useful tool without being analyzed. To connect the theory of judging poems with its practice, I will first describe how the editors of one poetry magazine make their choices, then I'll try to suggest criteria implicit in their judging, and finally ask if contemporary poems require special standards or approaches in judging.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.